From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 18:55:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CAAF16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:55:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harik.murex.com (mail.murex.com [194.98.239.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3FA243D2F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:55:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from interscan.fr.murex.com (iscan.murex.fr [172.21.17.207] (may be forged)) by harik.murex.com with ESMTP id j03IkZgu023828; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 19:46:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from mxmail.murex.com (interscan.murex.fr [127.0.0.1]) by interscan.fr.murex.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j03JMeE30129; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 20:22:47 +0100 Received: from mteterin.us.murex.com ([172.21.130.86]) by mxmail.murex.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 3 Jan 2005 19:54:40 +0100 From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: Joe Marcus Clarke Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 13:54:42 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200501030349.j033nMxC082033@corbulon.video-collage.com> <1104777629.60878.1.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <1104777629.60878.1.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501031354.42541.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jan 2005 18:54:41.0220 (UTC) FILETIME=[AE87C040:01C4F1C5] cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users Subject: Re: mozilla vs. nspr X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:55:15 -0000 > > However, can't the devel/nspr be brought up to date instead? Having each > > port install its own seems wrong and will lead to the "DLL hell" often > > found on Microsoft systems... > > devel/nspr is up-to-date with the official external nspr released from > Mozilla (4.4.1). This is what is required by nss 3.9.2, and used by > ports such as Evolution and Gaim. A terrible situation with a sloppy vendor... Would it hurt Evolution/Gaim and other users of the devel/nspr port, if we were to add latest updates to it? The "official" 4.4.1 is over a year old, and can, probably, be considered "abandoned" now... Yours, -mi