From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 10 19:17:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DF816A4CE; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:17:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503AF43D45; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:17:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809651DD4B2; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:17:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81575-01; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:17:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from metatron.ijs.si (metatron.ijs.si [193.2.4.152]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0BB1DD4F5; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:14:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from idefix.ijs.si (idefix.ijs.si [193.2.4.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by metatron.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E4C1C0008A; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:14:01 +0100 (CET) From: Dejan Lesjak To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:14:00 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050109225147.GA76457@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050109225147.GA76457@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501102014.00781.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si cc: x11@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Xaw3d PORTVERSION bump X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:17:51 -0000 On Sunday 09 of January 2005 23:51, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Also, I think Xaw3d should have received a PORTVERSION bump because > the shlib version changed, and things that depended on it now do not > upgrade correctly with portupgrade because it doesn't know they should > be rebuilt. > > Kris Yes, I should have done this when adding a patch to bump XAWVER to bsd.port.mk. I also modified pkg-message to take value of XAWVER into account. Thanks for notifying. Dejan