From owner-freebsd-alpha Sat Jan 5 10: 9:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DE437B41A for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 10:09:13 -0800 (PST) Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g05I8TM65200; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 19:08:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wkb) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 19:08:29 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte To: Bernd Walter Cc: "Floris 'Tamama' van Gog" , freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What could be wrong? very slow networking box Message-ID: <20020105190829.A65181@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <004401c195fe$18378c90$9600000a@tamama> <20020105175108.A15190@cicely8.cicely.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020105175108.A15190@cicely8.cicely.de>; from ticso@cicely8.cicely.de on Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 05:51:08PM +0100 X-OS: FreeBSD 4.5-PRERELEASE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 05:51:08PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 04:31:49PM +0100, Floris 'Tamama' van Gog wrote: > > Holas, > > > > I think this is not right > > > > bloodscent# ping localhost > > PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 48 data bytes > > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.056 ms > > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.700 ms > > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.629 ms > > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.678 ms > > ^C > > --- localhost ping statistics --- > > 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss > > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.629/0.766/1.056/0.170 ms > > bloodscent# > > > > I can remember local loopbacks to be a 'tad' faster (0.008ms or > > something like that) > > 8µS are only 1328 clock cycles on your 166MHz System. > Memory bandwidth is much slower - hard to beleave. > Maybe you had run Linux - AFAIK Linux ping show seconds... > > > Someone in #freebsd/undernet said it might be a hardware conflict > > somehow. > > > > The machine is an AXPCI33 166Mhz with 64MB ram (well its in the dmesg > > below). When I had natd and pptpclient going to get internet > > connectivity for my LAN the connection got so slow that it was > > noticable. A game, mostly udp data, 7.5kb/sec made the uptime stats go > > to 1.54 1.30 1.20 (the gateway was only routing) > > This is on a PC164, which is much faster than an AXPpci33: > ticso@cicely9> ping 127.0.0.1 > PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 48 data bytes > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.144 ms > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.092 ms > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.085 ms > 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.092 ms In case it makes anybody feel better, this is from a DS10, 466MHz/EV6 FreeBSD 4.5-PRERELEASE (DS10) #6: Fri Dec 21 15:12:41 CET 2001 ds10#ping localhost PING localhost.wbnet (127.0.0.1): 48 data bytes 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.064 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.033 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.031 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.032 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.036 ms -- | / o / /_ _ email: wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, The Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message