From owner-freebsd-current Fri Feb 7 5:30:43 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C2637B401; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 05:30:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from unet.ru (unet.ru [195.9.254.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF54D43F93; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 05:30:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vick@unet.ru) Received: from unet.ru by unet.ru (8.12.6/Unet) with ESMTP id h17DUG9J003849; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:30:23 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <3E43B4E8.1020908@unet.ru> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 16:30:16 +0300 From: Victor Ponomarev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20021030 X-Accept-Language: en, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: John Baldwin , James Schmidt , freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: se7500+dual xeon? References: <20030207004431.P63349@hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks to all! As I wrote it's a my mistake with kernel installing. I should pay more attention on upper part of dmesg ouput to see that new kernel didn't install. By the way does anyone compare heavy load multiprocessor performance 5.0-RELEASE and 4.7-STABLE? Is it worth to upgrade a production machine? Marc G. Fournier wrote: >On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > > > >>His board is a WV2, not a CW2. The WV2's should work fine though they >>might need a BIOS update. >> >> > >I can verify the WV2's ... just built a server with one of these .. can't >verify the BIOS issue, as it was upgraded before I got the machine, but >have been most impressd with both the server and the chassis ... > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message