Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 11:51:38 +0100 From: Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org> To: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some strangeness with CARP Message-ID: <5FC5E885-EE5D-4186-949E-F19F270CBE2E@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <2d5c3b3c-1ebd-3fd1-f36b-00b09cc6b87e@netfence.it> References: <2d5c3b3c-1ebd-3fd1-f36b-00b09cc6b87e@netfence.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 13. Feb 2022, at 11:45, Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BF >> On 2/12/22 13:38, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> Maybe the switch or something it=E2=80=99s connected to uses vrrp? >=20 > The switch has no options about VRRP, AFAICT (unless it can be called by a= different name) and I don't think any other device could use VRRP. >=20 According to their web site, some of their switches have support (don=E2=80=99= t know your model) under IP Application > VRRP > Configuration. Good luck getting to the bottom of this! Cheers Michael >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >> When using vhid 1, can you see any vrrp traffic using tcpdump >=20 > You mean "tcpdump vrrp"? > In that case I see CARP advertisements, as CARP is using the same protocol= number as VRRP. >=20 >=20 > bye & Thanks > av.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5FC5E885-EE5D-4186-949E-F19F270CBE2E>