Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Aug 2015 21:52:00 -0700
From:      Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r286687 - head
Message-ID:  <7AE78D6D-DE39-4C0F-A2AC-4778F4E304A8@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <55CC2114.4080904@freebsd.org>
References:  <201508121900.t7CJ0mhT080491@repo.freebsd.org> <55CC2114.4080904@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 12, 2015, at 21:46, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 8/13/15 3:00 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>> Author: imp
>> Date: Wed Aug 12 19:00:47 2015
>> New Revision: 286687
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/286687
>>=20
>> Log:
>>   Document build-tools better. Add rescue back because it builds =
/bin/sh
>>   which has a build-tools target (see commit for how build-tools and
>>   cross-tools differ).
> really? do we build ALL of rescue? that contains most of /bin and lots =
of /usr/bin.

build-tools only builds /bin/sh and bin/tcsh :

$ grep BUILDTOOLS rescue/rescue/Makefile=20
CRUNCH_BUILDTOOLS+=3D bin/sh
CRUNCH_BUILDTOOLS+=3D bin/csh

> that's  a lot..   Can we not just build/bin/sh itself?

That would.. probably make more sense (especially in a =
post-projects/bmake world)=85 but it needs better comments in =
Makefile.inc1 .

Thanks!
-NGie=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7AE78D6D-DE39-4C0F-A2AC-4778F4E304A8>