From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 29 17:57:42 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DC416A418 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:57:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (unknown [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9450D13C455 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lATHtcNH020330; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:55:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id lATHtYjZ020326; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:55:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:55:34 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Bart Silverstrim In-Reply-To: <474EB822.5020603@chrononomicon.com> Message-ID: <20071129185517.G20307@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <005901c8313f$f7048b70$0d00a8c0@bayoucshaffer> <474CA49D.50306@FreeBSD.org> <002001c831d5$80ad8670$0d00a8c0@bayoucshaffer> <003101c831da$a405bc50$0d00a8c0@bayoucshaffer> <20071129122043.A9040@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <474EB822.5020603@chrononomicon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Mark Evans Subject: Re: ls -l takes a forever to finish. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:57:42 -0000 >> >> ls takes 0.1 seconds user time, ls -l takes 0.3 second user time. >> >> unless you have 486/33 or slower system there is something wrong. > > Has anyone tried fsck and/or smartmontools on the drive? Maybe something > like Spinrite? he stated that CPU load is near 100% so it's not disk problem