From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 4 22:37:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46AB106564A; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 22:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garmitage@swin.edu.au) Received: from gpo3.cc.swin.edu.au (gpo3.cc.swin.edu.au [136.186.1.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBF58FC0C; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 22:37:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [136.186.229.44] (garmitage3.caia.swin.edu.au [136.186.229.44]) by gpo3.cc.swin.edu.au (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p94M61Ul005751 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:06:07 +1100 Message-ID: <4E8B8349.60705@swin.edu.au> Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 09:06:01 +1100 From: grenville armitage User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101211 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current , freebsd-stable References: <1317260554.93406.33.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <1317754080.15870.0.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <4E8B6382.1060001@buffalo.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 Available... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 22:37:34 -0000 On 10/05/2011 08:38, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd wrote: [..] >> It's nice that you want to help, but could you be less of a jerk about it to >> the people who devote a huge amount of time to the project? >> > Which ones: > - those who do not upgrade release information in release cycle ? > - those who commit broken stuff ? > - those who knowingly misdocument interfaces ? > - those who ignore obvious fixes ? > - those who ignore users request ? > - those who ignore users bugs ? > - those who refuses to share their work-in-progress ? > - those who tell you you're wrong for months to finally acknowledge > you are right, and commit your fixes ? Yep. Even them. cheers, gja