From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 00:48:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EE816A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:48:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.powertech.no (smtp1.powertech.no [195.159.0.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6922543D31 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:48:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frode@nordahl.net) Received: from [195.159.6.12] (dhcp12.ns5.powertech.no [195.159.6.12]) by smtp1.powertech.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0EF815A; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:48:54 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20040129135653.H21660@mail.allcaps.org> References: <3DC16400-517B-11D8-9CB2-0005028F6AEB@TrueStep.com> <68FC202A-525D-11D8-B122-000A95A9A574@nordahl.net> <20040129135653.H21660@mail.allcaps.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <236E6CBD-5301-11D8-B122-000A95A9A574@nordahl.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Frode Nordahl Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:48:56 +0100 To: "Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr." X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612) cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpc.lockd(8) seg faults on 5.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:48:58 -0000 Hello, I had default CFLAGS in effect, which includes -O. :-( Added -O0 now. Mvh, Frode On Jan 29, 2004, at 23:29, Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Frode Nordahl wrote: > >> Caught a new and different core dump from rpc.lockd today. >> >> (gdb) bt >> #0 dump_filelock (fl=0x809c000) at lockd_lock.c:318 >> #1 0x0804e0a1 in lock_nfslock (fl=0x8080815) at lockd_lock.c:875 > > Your line numbering seems off. You might want to provide a little more > context of what line actually failed. ie. line 875 indicates a > test_nfslock() call and 318 is an initial function bracket > > Nonetheless, the reasons for your core dumps elude me. In both cases, > the > fl should have caused a core dump *before* the line you are indicating. > > -a