From owner-freebsd-current Sun Nov 17 3:35:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC35737B401 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 03:35:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from magic.adaptec.com (magic.adaptec.com [208.236.45.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7685043E3B for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 03:35:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Scott_Long@adaptec.com) Received: from redfish.adaptec.com (redfish.adaptec.com [162.62.50.11]) by magic.adaptec.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAHBZJj28455; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 03:35:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from OTCEXC01.otc.adaptec.com (otcexc01.otc.adaptec.com [10.12.1.27]) by redfish.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA22129; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 03:35:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by otcexc01.otc.adaptec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <4TQCXWZ1>; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 06:35:17 -0500 Message-ID: <6100BCEB85F8E244959C756C04E0EDD161CB78@otcexc01.otc.adaptec.com> From: "Long, Scott" To: "'Miguel Mendez'" , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Is RAIDframe currently usable? Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 06:35:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Hi, > > Yesterday I installed a jpsnap (FreeBSD christine.energyhq.tk > 5.0-CURRENT-20021115-JPSNAP i386), and tried to setup a RAID0 config > with two disks. raidctl -C goes fine, so does -I and -iv. > Then fdisk'ed > and disklabelled. But when I tried to newfs the newly created > partition > I started getting a bunch of errors like this: RAIDframe should be considered highly experimental. While it was tested extensively under SMP in FreeBSD 4.x, it received very little testing under SMP in -current. If you have more details on this failure, I'd appreciate it. Scott > > --- > Nov 16 00:04:59 christine kernel: raid0: node (R ) returned fail, > rolling backward > Nov 16 00:04:59 christine kernel: raid0: DAG failure: r addr 0x40 (64) > nblk 0x20 (32) buf 0xcdd50ea0 > Nov 16 00:04:59 christine kernel: raid0: node (R ) returned fail, > rolling backw byte 76893 > --- > and so on. > > Anyway, the newfs process finishes, then a simple piped tar > to move the > old /usr to the RAID partition creates a myriad of those > messages, to a > point where the system spends all the time logging those > errors and tar > no longer continues. > > The system is a dual P3 box, running a slightly modified > GENERIC (added > SMP, raidframe and pcm), with INVARIANTS and WITNESS enabled (tried > without them too, no success). > > So, any known issues with RAIDframe? I can supply more > detailed info if > needed. > > Cheers, > -- > Miguel Mendez - flynn@energyhq.homeip.net > GPG Public Key :: http://energyhq.homeip.net/files/pubkey.txt > EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk > Of course it runs NetBSD! > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message