Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Nov 2000 20:58:43 -0800
From:      Jake Burkholder <jburkhol@home.com>
To:        Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
Cc:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Thread-specific data and KSEs 
Message-ID:  <20001122045843.0C16EBA7A@io.yi.org>
In-Reply-To: Message from Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>  of "Tue, 21 Nov 2000 22:33:50 EST." <Pine.SUN.3.91.1001121222649.28739A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> [001121 19:15] wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Don't more segment registers cause more overhead for context switches?
> > > 
> > > It's just one more register that has to be saved.  I don't
> > > think it's going to matter much.
> > 
> > No extra TLB faults/invalidations?  Aren't segment registers
> > somewhat expensive to load?
> 
> Not according to swtch.s, it's just a movl instruction.  I don't
> need to use the segment register to address anything.  I just
> need to load it with a value (an index into a global array
> of per-KSE structures).
> 
> If I'm being dense, feel free to smack me (just don't take too
> much enjoyment in it).

Actually this is probably a reason to use %fs, its already saved
and restored on entry and exit to the kernel.  These are the
user-mode register values, so they get saved on the kernel stack
in the system call and trap IDTVEC stubs, cpu_switch deals with
the kernel mode register values.  And yeah, loading the segment
registers is expensive comparatively.

> 
> --
> "Some folks are into open source, but me, I'm into open bar."
>                                           -- Spencer F. Katt
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001122045843.0C16EBA7A>