Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:48:53 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Philipp Wuensche <cryx-freebsd@h3q.com> Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD Message-ID: <20081211224737.B97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <49419482.2040502@h3q.com> References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> <1228483574.2805.499.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <86skp2l804.fsf@ds4.des.no> <1228507529.2805.539.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <49418BD9.8080105@h3q.com> <20081211221113.S97918@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <49419482.2040502@h3q.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote: Hi, >>> Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and >>> breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail. >> >> This is only true if you use any of the new features. In case you use >> single-IPv4 jails as before there should be absoultely no change in the >> output format. > > Why do I get the new jls output then when I only use one ipaddr. for a > jail and none of the new features at all? What are you using? The version from HEAD or are you running a patch on either HEAD or 7 and if so from when? /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081211224737.B97918>