From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu Feb 22 20:42:00 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3E6F292C7 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 20:41:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:80:80::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9345978782 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 20:41:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (lava.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:5::11]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w1MKfw4S094979 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:41:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from [192.168.43.26] (saphire3.sentex.net [192.168.43.26]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w1MKfukH002314 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:41:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Subject: Re: new Ryzen lockup issue ? From: Mike Tancsa To: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List References: Organization: Sentex Communications Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:41:57 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 20:42:00 -0000 On 2/21/2018 3:04 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > Not sure if I have found another issue specific to Ryzen, or a bug that > manifests itself on Ryzen systems easier. I installed the latest > virtualbox from the ports and was doing some network performance tests > between a vm and the hypervisor using iperf3. The guest is just a > RELENG11 image and the network is an em nic bridged to epair1b This looks possibly related to VirtualBox. Doing the same tests and more using bhyve, I dont get any lockup. Not to mention, network IO is MUCH faster. ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 x203 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada