From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 15:51:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E975016A418 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eculp@encontacto.net) Received: from farris.bafirst.com (adsl-074-165-190-154.sip.jan.bellsouth.net [74.165.190.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A4E13C45A for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:51:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eculp@encontacto.net) Received: from HOME.encontacto.net ([189.129.17.152]) by farris.bafirst.com with esmtp; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:51:47 -0600 id 0006D43A.47A88613.00003019 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 80) by HOME.encontacto.net with local; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:51:46 -0600 id 0004AC18.47A88612.0000A406 Received: from 172.16.0.2 (172.16.0.2 [172.16.0.2]) by intranet.encontacto.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:51:46 -0600 Message-ID: <20080205095146.61201n6l0n223eis@intranet.encontacto.net> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:51:46 -0600 From: eculp To: Jeremy Chadwick References: <20080204141316.76512pfm25is8i68@intranet.encontacto.net> <20080204220126.GA25963@eos.sc1.parodius.com> In-Reply-To: <20080204220126.GA25963@eos.sc1.parodius.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (5.0-cvs) Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Do SpamAssassin spamd and Obspamd play nicely together? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 15:51:51 -0000 Quoting Jeremy Chadwick : > On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 02:13:16PM -0600, eculp wrote: >> I have sa-spamd running and I just installed obspamd or pfspamd what ever >> it should be called and the spamd log file seems taken over by spamasassi= n. >> Are there any other conflicts or changes that should be made to use both= . > > Funny, since I indirectly touched on this problem many moons ago when > writing a document on issues we encountered when attempting to migrate > from postgrey to OpenBSD spamd. See section "Issues with OpenBSD spamd > on FreeBSD": http://jdc.parodius.com/freebsd/openbsd-spamd.txt Jeremy, Your link should be included everywhere. This is a logical,[all too =20 uncommon in today's world] common sense approach that answered all the =20 additional questions that I had not even asked yet because I was first =20 doing tests with the recommended (published) information yet without =20 success. Within 10 minutes after opening your link, I have it =20 running, hopefully as I expect, at least based on the "multiple input" =20 spamd log file ;) Now only time will tell but at least debugging my =20 configuration will now be easy. > > http://jdc.parodius.com/freebsd/openbsd-spamd.txt > > -- > | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | > | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | > | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | > | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | > >