From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 11 08:03:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E9616A420 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:03:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danchev@spnet.net) Received: from mail.data.bg (mail.data.bg [195.149.248.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBF9043D49 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:03:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danchev@spnet.net) Received: (qmail 8434 invoked by uid 104); 11 Oct 2005 08:03:40 -0000 Received: from danchev@spnet.net by mail by uid 104 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 2.20. uvscan: v4.1.40/v4100. Clear:SA:0(-2.5/8.0):AWL, BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.3. Processed in 1.948826 secs); 11 Oct 2005 08:03:40 -0000 X-Spam-Tag-Score: SA:0(-2.5/8.0):AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 X-Spamassassin-Hits: -2.5 X-Spamassassin-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 Received: from unknown (HELO danchev5.ddns.homelan.bg) (83.97.27.150) by smtp.data.bg with SMTP; 11 Oct 2005 08:03:38 -0000 From: George Danchev To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:03:37 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <861x2t280w.fsf@xps.des.no> <434AA5E2.10305@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <434AA5E2.10305@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510111103.37879.danchev@spnet.net> Subject: Re: width of #container X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:03:42 -0000 On Monday 10 October 2005 20:33, Emily Boyd wrote: > DES, > > > The attached patch addresses an issue that seems to annoy a lot of > > people on -developers: it changes the width of #container from a fixed > > 765px to a more flexible 75%. Any objections? > > Changing to a variable width layout is going to require a fair few > changes to the CSS, apart from changing the width of the container. > Currently the front page relies on fixed sizes, and just changing the > width of the container will not maintain the layout. > > I'm going to take a look at creating a variable width version of the CSS > this week - I may have to also change the design of the front page so > that it's more suited to variable width. Could you please define your conception about the ratios of the basic linear objects involved with the front page, because we all see different results. Thus we can start groking things from globals to details. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB