From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 11:55:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FA4985A for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:55:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wasikowski.net (mail.wasikowski.net [91.204.91.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D67714DC for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wasikowski.net (mail.wasikowski.net [IPv6:2001:6a0:1cb::b]) by mail.wasikowski.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D418985; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:55:23 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at wasikowski.net Received: from mail.wasikowski.net ([IPv6:2001:6a0:1cb::b]) by mail.wasikowski.net (scan.wasikowski.net [IPv6:2001:6a0:1cb::b]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 7ed2Bj9Cl5-F; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:55:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.138.150] (83-144-115-210.static.chello.pl [83.144.115.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wasikowski.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B86B82; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:55:23 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wasikowski.net; s=default; t=1390910123; bh=wmnP+1LWgmZ+QPIx8xWxrkODxVKINdXwY1dGybQ2rhQ=; h=Date:From:To:CC:References:In-Reply-To; b=ppAyey4tRBFPd/TWUC1eAOKfE1P4x9CNC5EV72ygqPppVzh5fGhr6lNVUf14nyPdV VHnSwlfUppm1G2E2DuiOcdlpA6xCb4gGsRVu1YmbZ6uF4Ychp4DXBEhCHFXcTYLihK 1vynCT0NAqg4ps0vaXqw5iqBIUcFJn+1Nt0UG47zzTI+GxZbxavG19Bb/XZ0srq5Zg +L/DE74xMPIxdLVdwJSw2dFyK2A7yM4uK1AXfFv0h41wry12rSzGXxe4ttd0vA6cBN qt8y4gLtB5NgeZARcHT97kpMsSGcM5CrwqrqsEvyVhZYKtfGadyhP9/zuEKbKuGm4X kbywT1XNhgoHQ== Message-ID: <52E79AAA.2000606@wasikowski.net> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:55:22 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?xYF1a2FzeiBXxIVzaWtvd3NraQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Brancatelli Subject: Re: BHyVe - ESXi comparison References: <52E7943E.2080908@wasikowski.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:55:26 -0000 W dniu 2014-01-28 12:52, Andrea Brancatelli pisze: > OK, I changed that, thanks for your feedback, my assumption was > something like "with bhyve it took the 106% of the time it took with > VMWare", but probably the approach of "bhyve being 6% slower" is clearer. I think so too. Thank you for testing! :) -- best regards, Lukasz Wasikowski