Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 19:56:54 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste <vallo@matti.ee> To: Jesus Rodriguez <jesusr@ncsa.es> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Your opinion please! Message-ID: <19990128195654.A5776@matti.ee> In-Reply-To: <01be4ae4$66e16900$8632b3c2@piolin.ncsa.es>; from Jesus Rodriguez on Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 06:34:05PM %2B0100 References: <01be4ae4$66e16900$8632b3c2@piolin.ncsa.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 06:34:05PM +0100, Jesus Rodriguez <jesusr@ncsa.es> wrote: > >In some cases Apache proxy capabilities are enough and squid is > >overkill. I mean older machines with small amount of memory. I > >believe squid needs more memory than apache, maybe I'm mistaken, god > >knows... > > Yes... for old/small machines maybe but for good/big proxies (and networked > sibling/parent proxies), squid is much better (imho). :) > > We have proxies from 2Gb to 30Gb with squid and they work very, very well. Certainly :) We also have an 4GB sized squid caching proxy, thus my comment was meant only as a remark. -- Vallo Kallaste vallo@matti.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990128195654.A5776>