From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 01:04:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91EC56EE for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 01:04:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EF9960 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 01:04:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.50]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF56DA71084 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 20:04:12 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 2939 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2013 01:04:12 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 31862, pid: 16880, t: 0.3554s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:10739 Received: from unknown (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Jan 2013 01:04:11 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.8]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B87833C1D; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 20:04:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id AC3FE39829; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 20:04:04 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Adam Vande More Subject: Re: sh script problem with capturing return code References: <50EC9009.3030305@a1poweruser.com> <20130108224626.8c2d89cd.freebsd@edvax.de> <50EC99F2.3020404@a1poweruser.com> <44d2xevlhb.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <50ED88CF.7060308@a1poweruser.com> <448v82unxb.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <444niqum7n.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <44zk0it6t5.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <44r4ltu8zp.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 20:04:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Adam Vande More's message of "Wed, 9 Jan 2013 21:07:57 -0600") Message-ID: <44libw8tiz.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 01:04:13 -0000 Adam Vande More writes: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Lowell Gilbert < > freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > >> Lowell Gilbert writes: >> >> > I think it's a real bug, and the test cases don't cover "extra" elements >> > at all. Now I just have to figure out the right fix. >> >> I'm pretty sure that the fix is just to set rval on jumping to the >> "extra" tag in vwalk() in src/usr.sbin/mtree/verify.c. >> >> But my hot water heater just exploded, so I may not look at code for a >> few more days. > > > I think they are importing NetBSD's updated mtree, perhaps already fixed > there. It isn't. Which means I probably should submit fixes to multiple places. Although NetBSD's changes seem fairly minor to me, from a quick look. The merge should not be difficult, no matter how it's approached.