From owner-freebsd-fs Wed Mar 21 4:52:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.via-net-works.net.ar (ns1.via-net-works.net.ar [200.10.100.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7865637B73B for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 04:52:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fpscha@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar) Received: (from fpscha@localhost) by ns1.via-net-works.net.ar (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA94399; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:52:52 -0300 (ART) From: Fernando Schapachnik Message-Id: <200103211252.JAA94399@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar> Subject: Re: growfs In-Reply-To: <200103210711.AAA22512@usr05.primenet.com> "from Terry Lambert at Mar 21, 2001 07:11:41 am" To: Terry Lambert Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:52:52 -0300 (ART) Cc: fschapachnik@vianetworks.com.ar, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: Fernando Schapachnik X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org En un mensaje anterior, Terry Lambert escribió: > > I was wondering how usable is the growfs implementation > > available in -CURRENT. > > > > Any chance of using it on -STABLE? > > It will work as well as it works pretty much everywhere, going > back a long time. I believe the first version from "Der Mouse" > ran on FreeBSD 1.1.5. Any place it can be downloaded? (I mean: is it just userland and I grab it from -CURRENT, or there kernel/UFS code patches also?). > > The problem with this is that you will get fragmentation; > consider the following two cases; the first is a disk of > size "10"; the second is a disk of size "6" that has been > "grown" to size "10". The "*" are allocated blocks, and > the "." are unallocated blocks; "o" are blocks that would > have been allocated in the new space, if it had been there > at the time the were allocated (but it wasn't): Thanks for the extense explanation! Actually, this is good enough for what I need: I'm planning to offer backup space to customers. So I will start with an x Gb HD (vinum'ed, of course). When I sold the whole of it, or I'm about to do it, then I will add a new one. The trick is that there are very high chances that when I've sold x Gb of backup space, the real used space is y, being y << x, so basically I'm adding disk space when there is a lot of space available still. Will that suffice, or am I lying somewhere? Thanks! Fernando P. Schapachnik Administración de la red VIA NET.WORKS ARGENTINA S.A. fschapachnik@vianetworks.com.ar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message