From owner-freebsd-net Mon Oct 2 7:39:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from urban.iinet.net.au (urban.iinet.net.au [203.59.24.231]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F0D37B502 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 07:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from popserver-02.iinet.net.au (popserver-02.iinet.net.au [203.59.24.148]) by urban.iinet.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA18320; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:39:10 +0800 Received: from elischer.org (reggae-39-206.nv.iinet.net.au [203.59.173.206]) by popserver-02.iinet.net.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA22584; Mon, 2 Oct 2000 22:38:59 +0800 Message-ID: <39D89DEB.956C1E21@elischer.org> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 07:38:35 -0700 From: Julian Elischer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Lemon Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SACK in FreeBSD TCP. References: <200010021358.e92DwbA14157@prism.flugsvamp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > In article you write: > >Is anyone working on a SACK (Selective acknowlegement) implementation > >for FreeBSD? > > I believe that Jayanth was working on it at one time, you could ask him. > > >It would make a huge difference to performance out here at the edge of the > >univertse (Perth, Western Australia) > > That's what all the Australians I know claim. But is there any hard > data to back that up as well? (E.g.: does Linux perform better out So the Linux types say, but of course that's not actual proof af anything.. > there?) > -- > Jonathan > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message -- __--_|\ Julian Elischer / \ julian@elischer.org ( OZ ) World tour 2000 ---> X_.---._/ presently in: Perth v To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message