From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 19:46:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E5E16A41F for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:46:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from dd2718.kasserver.com (dd2718.kasserver.com [81.209.184.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FBF43D45 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:46:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dslb-084-060-108-153.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.60.108.153]) by dd2718.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC12292395 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:46:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4373A385.1000400@chillt.de> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:46:13 +0100 From: Bartosz Fabianowski User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9ab7eeeb0511091335n27c1e029n@mail.gmail.com> <43738AF2.3030703@chillt.de> <9ab7eeeb0511101017r1861b9caw@mail.gmail.com> <437393D4.2040707@chillt.de> <9ab7eeeb0511101053x2373886av@mail.gmail.com> <9ab7eeeb0511101135x417c1e0o@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9ab7eeeb0511101135x417c1e0o@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error compiling OO 2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:46:17 -0000 > It seems that in my default ports installation the gcc-oo port doesnt > come lang/gcc-ooo was created by Maho on 16th December 2004. It should be present on your system if you have cvsupped ports or run portsnap after that date. It it's not there, you should check what's wrong with your ports tree. Maybe your cvsup refuse file is too strict or the supfile does not specify that you want ports-all? - Bartosz