From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 14:37:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCF31065687; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:37:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6345E8FC1F; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:37:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163DF46B23; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:37:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:37:45 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: "Arno J. Klaassen" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20080929043134.GD54819@cdnetworks.co.kr> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (BSF 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: pyunyh@gmail.com, stable@FreeBSD.org, rizzo@iet.unipi.it, net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 7.1-PRERELEASE : bad network performance (nfe0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:37:46 -0000 On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote: >>> However, the "request/respones" tests are awfull for my notebook (test >>> repeated on the notebook for the sake of conviction) : >> >> Is it possible to rerun these tests with a 7.0 kernel of the same general >> configuration? That would help us determine if it's a regression between >> 7.0 and 7.1, > > 7.0-RELEASE-p4 kernel (and 7.1 world) as well as 7.0-RELEASE life-cd give > same results : great streaming, very poor request/response Thanks for testing this -- it rules out a host of potential issues that could have been from changes in flight between 7.0 and 7.1, which is very helpful. At least for me, since I made many of those changes :-). >> or perhaps a more general issue between 6.x and 7.x. > > nve(4) does not recognise this chip. > > If someone does have a bootable 6-stable .iso with a backported nfe(4) ... > or email if_nfe.ko to me and I will tes under 6-stable > > For now I will test the patches Pyun and Luigi sent me and let you know. OK. I'll drop out of the loop on this one unless it's determined that the network stack itself is implicated rather than the drivers. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge