Date: Mon, 27 Mar 1995 13:43:01 -0800 (PST) From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> To: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu, paul@isl.cf.ac.uk, bde@zeta.org.au, davidg@Root.COM, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: shared library versioning Message-ID: <199503272143.NAA29986@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <9650.796340262@freefall.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Mar 27, 95 01:37:42 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I didn't see a bump, but as a result of this change, it should be. > > So instead of said binaries failing catastrophically on a link > error, they just fail to find the library in question and fail > catastrophically on a missing library? > > I somehow fail to see the point. So do I. This will make >ALL< 2.1 binaries fail on a 2.0 system, leaving the version number as it was would only have a few 2.1 binaries (as of yet nonexistent ones) fail on a 2.0 system. revert please. -- Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503272143.NAA29986>