From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Sep 23 23:02:59 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA04183
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 23 Sep 1997 23:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca32-10.ix.netcom.com [199.35.209.74])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA04177
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 1997 23:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.7/8.6.9) id XAA10020; Tue, 23 Sep 1997 23:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 23:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199709240602.XAA10020@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de
CC: dkelly@hiwaay.net, ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <19970922031638.40051@panke.de> (message from Wolfram Schneider on Mon, 22 Sep 1997 03:16:39 +0200)
Subject: Re: Motif (Re: New ports added/updated last two weeks)
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

(People, please don't "BCC:" mail to a public list...well that's at
least how I think I got this one.)

 * Sorry, I can't fix it. Motif is not a port and 
 * references to Motif are not stored in the database ports/INDEX.
 * 
 * "Requires:" point only to FreeBSD ports.

You are right.

When lesstif gets to the point that it can run most ports, we'll
probably just make it a regular dependency.  As long as we keep the
shared library version consistent, it should work just fine with
people with real Motif too.

Satoshi