From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Nov 9 02:28:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B673A291A6 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 02:28:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12EB91E83 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 02:28:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 44626 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2015 02:28:46 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 02:28:46 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.103] (unknown [181.55.232.163]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id B4F701A0252; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 02:28:44 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: r288669 breaks ports building with USE_GCC=yes From: Pedro Giffuni In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 21:24:13 -0500 Cc: Justin Hibbits , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <561C1523.7080200@FreeBSD.org> <561C17F2.2030206@FreeBSD.org> <561C4F10.7060206@FreeBSD.org> <561D129C.9040604@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 02:28:53 -0000 Hi Gerald; > Il giorno 08/nov/2015, alle ore 19:00, Gerald Pfeifer = ha scritto: >=20 > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Justin Hibbits wrote: >> As Antoine mentioned, the problem is that lang/gcc does not have this >> patch. USE_GCC uses lang/gcc, not lang/gcc48. So lang/gcc needs to >> be updated. >=20 > I have (finally) managed to steal the team, kicked off testing, > and plan on committing the patches already in lang/gcc48 also > to lang/gcc in the next 24 hours. >=20 Great! We already worked around the issue by disabling = stack-protector-strong for gcc48 though. What looks somewhat strange to me is that lang/gcc is = an independent port when it should just be a link to the current gcc = default. > Thanks for the report and suggestions! >=20 BTW, perhaps it=E2=80=99s time to bump the default gcc to gcc49? ;). Regards, Pedro.