From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 13 10:30:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA89FED for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:30:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@exonetric.com) Received: from relay.exonetric.net (relay0.exonetric.net [178.250.72.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB3F8FC08 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.111.190] (unknown [62.244.179.74]) by relay.exonetric.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3B0B2C88E; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:30:04 +0000 (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: high performance server design approach From: Mark Blackman In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:30:06 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <73EA6F0E-0170-4738-80D0-F911AEE5E1CD@exonetric.com> To: Friedrich Locke X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:30:06 -0000 On 13 Nov 2012, at 10:28, Friedrich Locke wrote: > Thank you Mark for suggestion, but my doubt still remains. perhaps some benchmarking/testing will help clear up the doubt? - Mark