From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Sep 13 21:44:11 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA21077
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 13 Sep 1997 21:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usr08.primenet.com (tlambert@usr08.primenet.com [206.165.6.208])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA21068
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 13 Sep 1997 21:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from tlambert@localhost)
	by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA08806;
	Sat, 13 Sep 1997 21:44:04 -0700 (MST)
From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Message-Id: <199709140444.VAA08806@usr08.primenet.com>
Subject: Re: What is wrong with this snipet?
To: Shimon@i-connect.net (Simon Shapiro)
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 04:44:03 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.970913163442.Shimon@i-Connect.Net> from "Simon Shapiro" at Sep 13, 97 04:34:42 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Why would the following segfault on 6 of the 10 iterations?

Forget that, we want to know how you get 5 more iterations (minimum)
out of a program that's already segfaulted.  8-).


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.