From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 14 23:31:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E141F16A4CE for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:31:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB8343D5D for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:31:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adam.mclaurin@gmx.net) Received: from 209-150-62-14.c3-0.arl-ubr1.sbo-arl.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.150.62.14] helo=jake) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #7) id 1Ba0tu-0005JZ-00 for ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 19:30:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 19:30:02 -0400 From: Adam McLaurin To: ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040614193002.585ff236.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20040614190129.05afd037.rpratt1950@earthlink.net> References: <20040613183233.7641f818.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> <20040614163108.32bbbebe.jylefort@brutele.be> <20040614180010.1ee7a79b.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> <20040614190129.05afd037.rpratt1950@earthlink.net> Organization: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.9-gtk2-20040229 (GTK+ 2.4.3; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: sylpheed-gtk2 updated to 0.9.11 today (PROBLEM!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:31:35 -0000 On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 19:01:29 -0400 Randy Pratt wrote: > I had a similar thing happen. I'll almost bet that you had > sylpheed running while doing portupgrade. I'll also go a bit > further and bet that the ONE mail that didn't disappear was the > one that you were last looking at in the mail box where they > "vanished". Actually you're quite wrong here. I purposely closed sylpheed while running portupgrade, and the ONE mail that didn't disappear hadn't been looked at for months (not to mention I lost mails in two different folder). > I don't think you lost any mail. Fortunately you are correct here. I downgraded my sylpheed back to the previous version, and immediately when I opened those two folders, all the mails re-appeared. Also, the older sylpheed doesn't have any issues reading the headers for the mails in those folders. > This made me add another check step to my portupgrade procedures. > I check the list of ports to be upgraded and if any of them are > currently running, I shut them down before updating. Its probably > not necessary in all cases but this is now what I do. This has been common practice in my world for years ... Thanks, Adam