From owner-freebsd-lite2  Mon Sep  9 04:34:52 1996
Return-Path: owner-lite2
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id EAA16445
          for lite2-outgoing; Mon, 9 Sep 1996 04:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (spinner.DIALix.COM [192.203.228.67])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA16440
          for <lite2@freebsd.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 1996 04:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (localhost.DIALix.oz.au [127.0.0.1])
          by spinner.DIALix.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA08251;
          Mon, 9 Sep 1996 19:32:13 +0800 (WST)
Message-Id: <199609091132.TAA08251@spinner.DIALix.COM>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.7 5/3/96
To: Doug Rabson <dfr@render.com>
cc: lite2@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: LITE2 branch is fixed.. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Sep 1996 11:41:42 +0100."
             <Pine.BSF.3.95.960909114038.4396H-100000@minnow.render.com> 
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 1996 19:32:13 +0800
From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com>
Sender: owner-lite2@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Sep 1996, Peter Wemm wrote:
> 
> > I think I forgot to mention that I've finished the recreation of the LITE2 
> > repository with non-conflicting branch numbers.
> > 
> > It's now ready to have commits.  Basically, it is almost exactly like 
> > RELENG_2_1_0, except the tag is "LITE2".
> > 
> > Doug? Jeff?  Do you need more details?  (and for that matter, do we need 
> > more code in the repository to cover sbin etc?)
> 
> I think we can do without sbin for a while.  The changes there are fairly
> minimal.

The lite2 version has compatability code so that it recognises the integer 
MOUNT_UFS when supplied as the first char * arg, doesn't it?  If so, we 
can use the existing binaries for the time being...

Cheers,
-Peter