From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 5 22:12:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from cs.rice.edu (cs.rice.edu [128.42.1.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95E114DDA for ; Sun, 5 Dec 1999 22:12:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aron@cs.rice.edu) Received: (from aron@localhost) by cs.rice.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) id AAA26520; Mon, 6 Dec 1999 00:12:10 -0600 (CST) From: Mohit Aron Message-Id: <199912060612.AAA26520@cs.rice.edu> Subject: Re: new Intel 100Mbps card To: wes@softweyr.com (Wes Peters) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 00:12:10 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <384B5255.EE6CF1B7@softweyr.com> from "Wes Peters" at Dec 5, 99 11:06:13 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > If you can't find the id on the chip, I'll see what I can track down at > Intel tomorrow. > I am looking up the Intel website. The chip indeed is 82559. Also there doesn't seem to be a correlation between the chip and the PCI device_id. I have two network cards (I mentioned them in my last postings) with different device_ids but the same 82559 chip on them. From the Intel's page, I was able to find the technical names for the two cards that I've been talking about. 1) Intel InBusiness 10/100 adaptor - this one has a device_id of 0x1030. 2) Pro/100+ PCI Management adaptor (board id number is 721383-xxx). This has the usual PCI device_id of 0x1229. The relevant website that displays the above information is: http://support.intel.com/support/network/adapter/pro100/21397.htm - Mohit To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message