From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 21 11:29:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C21237B401 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:29:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net (stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45C243F3F for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:29:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0061.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.61] helo=mindspring.com) by stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 197g2p-0001pd-00; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:29:36 -0700 Message-ID: <3EA4382F.6CA7C63A@mindspring.com> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:27:59 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Roberson References: <20030421124423.Y76635-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a411ca1d8b0db9acde5e82ce88d3d8bccd350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: threads@freebsd.org cc: Daniel Eischen Subject: Re: libkse -> libpthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 18:29:44 -0000 Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > Since libkse seems to be generally useful, anyone mind if I > > go back to installing it as libpthread? > > There is some question over whether kse or thr will be the default > threading implementation for 5.1. I think this should be discussed before > we decide on what lib uses libpthread. Isn't libthr really just libkse with N = M? These should behave exactly the same, right? It should even be possible to drop the UTS out of the picture for everything but signal handling, I think (i.e. it would never get upcalled) in the 1:1 case, if this were done? -- Terry