From owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 25 23:02:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: small@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF2316B4E3; Thu, 25 May 2006 22:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from james@wgold.demon.co.uk) Received: from anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE5843D46; Thu, 25 May 2006 22:59:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james@wgold.demon.co.uk) Received: from wgold.demon.co.uk ([158.152.96.124] helo=thor) by anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1FjOnS-0006ug-H6; Thu, 25 May 2006 22:59:14 +0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 by thor ([127.0.0.1] running VPOP3) with SMTP; Thu, 25 May 2006 23:55:22 +0100 From: "James Mansion" To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" , , Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 23:55:20 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <2538.1148556253@critter.freebsd.dk> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Server: VPOP3 V1.5.0k - Registered Cc: Subject: RE: FreeBSD's embedded agenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-small@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 23:02:38 -0000 >FreeBSD is a great operating system for embedded use and people >all over the world use this to their advantage. This is really nice to see. I'd also urge you to widen it to a more general 'customised constrained boot environment' though, even if teh focus is quite different. The sort of thing I'd be interested in would be PXE-booting a 'bootstrap system' with minimalist facilities, then mounting drives from iSCSI (or NFS, CIFS etc) and extending to have a more complete but still highly customised environment, whether to support compute blades or diskless workstations (using the wonderful nVidia and ATI hardware support that Linux will by then lack, ha ha ;-)). Its this first stage where you can get up and running that I think might share some of the same issues. James