Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:33:00 +0300
From:      Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Rick Macklem <rmacklem@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r220906 - head/sys/fs/nfsclient
Message-ID:  <20110421103300.GK48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <201104202325.p3KNPIK6070781@svn.freebsd.org>
References:  <201104202325.p3KNPIK6070781@svn.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--b/6gol1SqNxk8K3i
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:25:18PM +0000, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Author: rmacklem
> Date: Wed Apr 20 23:25:18 2011
> New Revision: 220906
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/220906
>=20
> Log:
>   Add a check for VI_DOOMED at the beginning of nfscl_request()
>   so that it won't try and use vp->v_mount to do an RPC during
>   a forced dismount. There needs to be at least one more kernel
>   commit, plus a change to the umount(8) command before forced
>   dismounts will work for the experimental NFS client.
>  =20
>   MFC after:	2 weeks
>=20
> Modified:
>   head/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clport.c
>=20
> Modified: head/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clport.c
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D
> --- head/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clport.c	Wed Apr 20 23:20:00 2011	(r220905)
> +++ head/sys/fs/nfsclient/nfs_clport.c	Wed Apr 20 23:25:18 2011	(r220906)
> @@ -819,6 +819,8 @@ nfscl_request(struct nfsrv_descript *nd,
>  	int ret, vers;
>  	struct nfsmount *nmp;
> =20
> +	if ((vp->v_iflag & VI_DOOMED) !=3D 0)
> +		return (EPERM);
>  	nmp =3D VFSTONFS(vp->v_mount);
>  	if (nd->nd_flag & ND_NFSV4)
>  		vers =3D NFS_VER4;

Is vnode lock held at this point ? If yes, I suggest to add
ASSERT_VOP_{E,}LOCKED() assertion both to enforce the invariant, and
to document the state to readers of the code.

--b/6gol1SqNxk8K3i
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk2wB9wACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4i/BgCfSMLXRIF9fwGgyDx6Kth+eSdf
Ja8AoM2Ec7eNjJrSMf8y8cPbvwNOPLAM
=AzcF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--b/6gol1SqNxk8K3i--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110421103300.GK48734>