From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 20 15: 3:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988AD37B422; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 15:03:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA02285; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 16:03:31 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id QAA50383; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 16:03:13 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200009202203.QAA50383@harmony.village.org> To: Marc Tardif Subject: Re: Frustration with SCSI system Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 20 Sep 2000 16:09:13 EDT." References: Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 16:03:13 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message Marc Tardif writes: : What would be the incentives to using vinum instead of simply : concatenating drives in a RAID-1 array (or whatever) using ccd(4)? RAID-5 now seems to be supported, which lets you take the loss of a single disk more easily. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message