From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 19 01:32:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA19749 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 19 May 1998 01:32:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.visint.co.uk (wakko.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA19706 for ; Tue, 19 May 1998 01:31:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from steve@visint.co.uk) Received: from dylan.visint.co.uk (dylan.visint.co.uk [194.207.134.180]) by mail.visint.co.uk (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA13154; Tue, 19 May 1998 09:31:51 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 09:31:10 +0100 (BST) From: Stephen Roome To: Julian Elischer cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: talk (fwd) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 18 May 1998, Julian Elischer wrote: > The "Itsy Pocket Computer" is a small handheld computer based on the > low-power, high-performance StrongARM SA-1100 microprocessor. Our > current prototype runs at 200MHz on a pair of AAA batteries, and > sports a tiny, high-resolution LCD touchscreen, a high-quality audio > codec, and up to 64MB of memory. So, how much do they cost ? > do we have a strong-arm version of FreeBSD coming up? :-) I guess that would be a "No". Wasn't someone writing ARMbsd or RISCbsd or something.. did he die or did Intel pay him to stop or something ? [It still amazes me that there are so many better options than Intel and no-one ever uses them, writing ARM is a damn sight easier than 80x86 code yet no-one ever writes for what seems to be a cheaper and far superior chipset.Please excuse my ranting, but I find this overmonopolised (sp?) industry this somewhat depressing.] Steve Steve Roome - Vision Interactive Ltd. Tel:+44(0)117 9730597 Home:+44(0)976 241342 WWW: http://dylan.visint.co.uk/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message