Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:10:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/52790: New port: shells/bash-completion Message-ID: <200306052310.h55NAHDS004386@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/52790; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> To: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/52790: New port: shells/bash-completion Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 03:08:45 +0400 Kirk Strauser wrote: > Thanks for fixing that. It worked correctly on my system before using the > "shar" command to create the archive, but I don't know enough about that > command to get it to do the right thing. I think the pacth was good and may be shar archive too. But something has changed tabs with white spaces. May be your MUA? > Should it be dependent on bash2? While I agree that it's mostly useless > without bash2, isn't there a possibility that it could be regarded as > documentation, or used with a Linux bash from one of the linux_base > installations? Yes, there is a possibility. But I don't think a man will use bash without putting path to it into $PATH. If so port will satisfied. But if the port will not found bash in $PATH it'll install shell/bash2. I think it's reasonable. --- Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200306052310.h55NAHDS004386>