Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:30:58 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How much security should ldconfig enforce? Message-ID: <218.964683058@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 26 Jul 2000 19:36:13 PDT." <XFMail.000726193613.jdp@polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>3. It could default to strictly secure but accept a command-line >option to relax the constraints. And an rc.conf knob could be added >to control whether or not it was strict at boot time. > >What do you folks think about this? Following on the "tools, not policy" the 3rd option has support. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?218.964683058>