Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:23:26 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang Message-ID: <201206221223.q5MCNQxp041638@mail.r-bonomi.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211916060.4170@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> > >> "We put clang because sponsors wanted it." > >> > > > > > > Sponsors didn't want clang. Sponsors wanted not to be encumbered by a GPLv3 > they are not. > programs compiled by GPLv3 compiler are not encumbered. You don't know what you don't know, trollboi. Anything so much as -linked- with a libarary that is under GPLv3, *IS* subject to GPLv3 terms, -unless- the library has an express exclusion
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201206221223.q5MCNQxp041638>