From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jan 16 23:16:42 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA12226 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 23:16:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA12221 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 23:16:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: (from jkh@localhost) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) id XAA00345 for current@freebsd.org; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 23:16:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 23:16:57 -0800 (PST) From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Message-Id: <199901170716.XAA00345@zippy.cdrom.com> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Annoying messages on startup.. Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG jkh@zippy-> dmesg|grep Freeing Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 11. Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 10. Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 10. Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 10. Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 9. Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 10. Can these just go away? They certainly don't tell *me* anything useful and if it's a feature which should be implemented then we ought to implement it. If it's just a harmless warning, then we ought to just remove it. :-) Thanks... It would be nice to have this one dealt with before we branch in 4 days.. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message