From nobody Mon Dec 5 18:08:28 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NQs4C66pvz4kJfj for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 18:08:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rainer@ultra-secure.de) Received: from connect.ultra-secure.de (connect.ultra-secure.de [88.198.71.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NQs4C1MMzz4K8w for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 18:08:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rainer@ultra-secure.de) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: (Haraka outbound); Mon, 05 Dec 2022 19:08:35 +0100 Received-SPF: SoftFail (connect.ultra-secure.de: domain of ultra-secure.de does not designate 127.0.0.10 as permitted sender) receiver=connect.ultra-secure.de; identity=mailfrom; client-ip=127.0.0.10; helo=connect.ultra-secure.de; envelope-from= Received: from connect.ultra-secure.de (webmail [127.0.0.10]) by connect.ultra-secure.de (Haraka/2.6.2-toaster) with ESMTPSA id FA014DBE-AD62-4F34-9CE5-A90DF670F3CA.1 envelope-from (authenticated bits=0) (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA verify=NO); Mon, 05 Dec 2022 19:08:29 +0100 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 19:08:28 +0100 From: rainer@ultra-secure.de To: Chris Cc: freebsd-current , owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why was Sendmail replaced with DMA? In-Reply-To: <8abdbf2771e76dbdd35f49e76b8f7cf9@bsdforge.com> References: <8abdbf2771e76dbdd35f49e76b8f7cf9@bsdforge.com> Message-ID: <01994b0a101b6b2003c8404c29316467@ultra-secure.de> X-Sender: rainer@ultra-secure.de User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.0 X-Haraka-GeoIP: --, , NaNkm X-Haraka-GeoIP-Received: X-Haraka-p0f: os="undefined undefined" link_type="undefined" distance=undefined total_conn=undefined shared_ip=Y X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on spamassassin X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Haraka-Karma: score: 6, good: 1620, bad: 0, connections: 1626, history: 1620, pass:all_good, relaying X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4NQs4C1MMzz4K8w X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:88.198.0.0/16, country:DE] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Am 2022-12-05 18:37, schrieb Chris: > I just noticed that FreeBSD will now install dma(8) instead of > sendmail(8) as the default mailer. Why is this so? > > Thank you > > --chris I think the problem was that the original developers of sendmail have mostly disappeared. More or less. It looked like abandonware. I'm sorry for the people who still use and love it - but the first thing we do is install postfix and set a relayhost... Rainer