Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:24:56 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 213658] [PATCH] lang/lua53: Take MAINTAINER'ship, Add bug fix patches Message-ID: <bug-213658-13-BP4938SBqu@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-213658-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-213658-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213658 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needs-patch, needs-qa CC| |gmesalazar@gmail.com, | |koobs@FreeBSD.org Summary|[PATCH] lang/lua53: add bug |[PATCH] lang/lua53: Take |fix patches |MAINTAINER'ship, Add bug | |fix patches Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(gmesal | |azar@gmail.com), | |merge-quarterly? Status|New |Open --- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- @Guilherme Should these bug fixes be merged to the quarterly branch for tho= se users? Additionally, the version of the port needs to be modified/incremented in s= ome manner. While we could 'just' increment PORTREVISION, it's probably worth u= sing DISTVERSION to append some .X, -X, -pX or similar suffix. Is there an official version format in use upstream for these we can use? I note the URL's for each of bug 1-4 link to "5.3.3-4". Could we use a plain "5.3.3.4" ? Please also confirm that the changes pass QA (portlint, poudriere) if possi= ble. For more details see: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing.= html And thank you for offering to maintain this port. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-213658-13-BP4938SBqu>