From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 9 21:33:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from eagle.phc.igs.net (eagle.phc.igs.net [207.210.17.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F5F14F06 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 1999 21:33:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eagle@eagle.phc.igs.net) Received: from localhost (eagle@localhost) by eagle.phc.igs.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA21005; Fri, 9 Apr 1999 23:28:09 GMT (envelope-from eagle@eagle.phc.igs.net) Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 23:28:09 +0000 (GMT) From: eagle To: Chuck Robey Cc: Rod Taylor , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATTENTION PLEASE: g77 in base system. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 10 Apr 1999, Chuck Robey wrote: > On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, eagle wrote: > > > > Whelp... I vote to break tradition. Hack away... The installer takes > > > care of alot of stuff like ports installs. Perhaps different standard > > > setups could be configured as ports. Ie. 'bloated setup' would require > > > all the ports which are currently included. > > > > > > 'Server setup' port wouldn't have any Client stuff. > > > > > > 'Desktop' could install a 'nicer' windomanager (kde? gnome?) for teh user, > > > and be pre-setup to start xdm, etc. > > > > > > The installer can currently install packages, so reworking those 'system > > > install options' to fit simpler naming convention than 'Kernel Hacker, X > > > user, X+ source, etc.' may be appropriate. > > > > > > I know.. lots of talk and no action. Oh well... my thoughts :) > > > > > well geeze Xwindows isnt in the base source tree anymore, what more do > > ya want ;) > > Anymore? It's never been there to begin with. perhaps i'm wrong but i woulda swore it was in /usr/src/contrib in 4.4lite2 at least rob To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message