Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 22:44:27 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 271823] x11-wm/mutter: enable DMABUF support Message-ID: <bug-271823-6497-wGo3jCa0fg@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-271823-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-271823-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D271823 Charlie Li <vishwin@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|maintainer-feedback?(gnome@ |maintainer-feedback+ |FreeBSD.org) | --- Comment #7 from Charlie Li <vishwin@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #5) No. You don't get to restore a question-mark maintainer-feedback flag so you can get it to time out faster. Also consider that some gnome@/desktop@ WIPs= are not entirely "public" on project spaces for reasons, and I have a laundry l= ist of them. Furthermore, work, to unbreak, update or anywhere in between, on m= ore foundational puzzle pieces can interfere with "leafy" stuff, but they need = to get done. Upstreaming is a personal priority. Consider that the work will get done wh= en it gets done, and many times in desktop-land, cannot be done as isolated/discrete components. (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #6) Cinnamon has practically always been a gnome@ property. But that's getting a bit off-topic for this bug. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-271823-6497-wGo3jCa0fg>