From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Sep 20 12:22:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from tara.freenix.org (keltia.freenix.org [62.4.20.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBF937B401; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 12:22:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by tara.freenix.org (Postfix/TLS, from userid 101) id 30F89108; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 21:22:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 21:22:26 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: Kirk McKusick Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New option for newfs Message-ID: <20010920212226.A28322@tara.freenix.org> References: <20010920094130.A54908@dragon.nuxi.com> <200109201815.f8KIFQh33875@beastie.mckusick.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200109201815.f8KIFQh33875@beastie.mckusick.com>; from mckusick@mckusick.com on Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 11:15:26AM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT K6-3D/266 & 2x PPro/200 SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG According to Kirk McKusick: > I would propose an even simpler change. If -c is not specified, > have it select the maximum possible rather than the current > default value of 22. Users that do not want the maximum possible > can over-ride that default by using -c. That's probably the best option, I'll resubmit a diff for that. Apparently the largest allowable value is found by trial and error, I'll keep the same algorithm. Thanks to all for your comments! -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 5.0-CURRENT #80: Sun Jun 4 22:44:19 CEST 2000 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message