From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 3 02:52:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C4A37B401 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 02:52:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de (antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de [134.102.176.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A2E43F93 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 02:52:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from taipeh.ant.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.176.3] helo=ant.uni-bremen.de) by antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1912Md-000IC5-00; Thu, 03 Apr 2003 12:54:35 +0200 Message-ID: <3E8C12C8.5050503@ant.uni-bremen.de> Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 12:54:00 +0200 From: Heinrich Rebehn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Grant References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newfs parameters for a 500 GB volume ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 10:52:56 -0000 Jan Grant wrote: >On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > > > >>Thank you for your reply. I have reread the manpage and would go for: >>- blocksize => 64 kB >>- fragsize => 64/8 => 8 kB >>- bytes/inode => 16 kB >> >>Are these values reasonable or should i use higher values (because the >>disk is so large?) >> >> > >I'd turn bytes per inode up to 200k or so - there's a paragraph in "man >7 tuning" on this. > >If the application is critical then benchmarking "real use" as closely >as possible will enable you to find optimal sizes for stripes, and is >probably time well spent. > > > > Oh, i had forgotten the tuning(7) manpage. Neiter newfs nore tunefs contain a refrence to it! Having read it, i am not so sure about the blocksize any more.I t says that going higher that 16K can make the fs slower. Does this still hold true? As for bytes/inode, i would now use 262144. Striping will be done by a 3ware escalade raid controller, which (i *think*) does not give me much choices about the stripesize. Heinrich