From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 31 09:09:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A05E1065763 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:09:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@lev.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (77-93-215-190.static.masterinter.net [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F658FC13 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@lev.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8EE9CB395; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:08:25 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0vASt9PBT31U; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:08:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from lev.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB78B9CB524; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:08:22 +0100 (CET) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by lev.vlakno.cz (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m9V98MRW041741; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:08:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:08:22 +0100 From: Roman Divacky To: Juergen Lock Message-ID: <20081031090822.GA41624@freebsd.org> References: <200810280859.24048@aldan> <20081028181731.GA30591@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <20081028205634.GA93288@freebsd.org> <20081029162105.18469pltiqtoqmao@webmail.leidinger.net> <200810302250.m9UMoHpl014714@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200810302250.m9UMoHpl014714@saturn.kn-bremen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: flash9 checklist (was: flash-9, 10 on FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:09:31 -0000 > > we can expect problems in future > >when people dont mount linprocfs.. > > > >maybe we should put some checks into linuxulator... > > Or if we put something in browser startup scripts it also needs to > be in the native ones since those can use linux flash via wrappers > as well. the native ff + linuxflash uses linuxulator (ie. /compat/linux/proc) ? I dont think so... anyway, linprocfs does not seem to be optional anymore, we should reflect that somehow