Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 14:52:15 +0200 From: A FreeBSD User <freebsd@walstatt-de.de> To: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: net/asterisk22: Illegal instruction Message-ID: <20250622145242.7840523a@thor.sb211.local> In-Reply-To: <f77a9e52-8bd7-4cc8-84f0-ab4a71ba3c9b@madpilot.net> References: <20250621141656.2b7572e5@thor.sb211.local> <f77a9e52-8bd7-4cc8-84f0-ab4a71ba3c9b@madpilot.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/R_PqDfs9AC0/nI5HJxXDm9X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Tage des Herren Sat, 21 Jun 2025 15:16:40 +0200 Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> schrieb: > On 6/21/25 14:17, A FreeBSD User wrote: > > Hello, > >=20 > > After a recent upgrade of a 14-STABLE (14.3-STABLE #0 n271755-ef360183d= f81: Sat Jun 21 > > 11:23:41 CEST 2025 amd64) appliance and net/asterisk22 (poudriere build= , builder host is > > also 14-STABLE, just for the record) the asteriks binzry quits with > >=20 > > Illegal instruction (platform: PCEngine APU4C2, hw.model: AMD GX-412TC = SOC). > >=20 > > Does anybody see this issue, too? > >=20 > > =20 >=20 > If I understand correctly you are building binaries yourself. That is correct. >=20 > Do you use any optimization options, especially -march and similar ones? I;m not aware of using optimizations on net/asterisk* ports themselfs but I= have made a "make rmconfig config" recently due to the same thought as of yours. On net/aster= isk, I haven't changed anything within the past few months, but I also do not track versio= ns, my fault - so the statement is a kind of useless. I also have no clue about faulty optimi= zations in adjacent/required ports like those mutually transcribing codecs which are c= andidates for vectore unit optimizations, I guess. What happened is: I exchanged my build= er platform from Intel based, much outdated Xeon Ivybridge to recent AMD Zen 5 based equipme= nt. While in the bureau an older dual socket Intel Xeon performs the same task without probl= ems, first guess is a problem with compiling AMD Zen5 code. =20 >=20 > The error could be caused by a binary optimized for a newer arch=20 > supporting features (so instructions) not supported by the actual CPU=20 > you're using. >=20 > It is quite possible that with the same optimizations the previous=20 > version used to work and the newer one does not. Maybe the code in the=20 > old version did not cause the compiler to output any instructions not=20 > compatible with your CPU, while some code in the new version does. >=20 >=20 > This is just one possibility though, maybe there are more possible causes. >=20 That possibility sounds reasonable, see my comment on the hardware vendor c= hange of the CPU. I disabled all optimization flags as far I got a handle on them and/or being = aware of, so the host is just right now a complete new repository for 14-STABLE. It did not = help just disabling the optimization flag on both net/asterisk20 and net/asterisk22 (both suffe= r from the same issue). Will report back. Kind regards, oh --=20 A FreeBSD user --Sig_/R_PqDfs9AC0/nI5HJxXDm9X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQRQheDybVktG5eW/1Kxzvs8OqokrwUCaFf8mgAKCRCxzvs8Oqok r9XOAQDFAkMISIhA9AlDyZM4eSkKtxZwl/7NMsu8kKkArqF0BgEArKazmiYXB3kf o6egLeJjiFQ8jyqCsZIJFhEUDW91qgk= =dVYy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/R_PqDfs9AC0/nI5HJxXDm9X--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20250622145242.7840523a>