From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jul 23 06:10:29 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id GAA01728
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 06:10:29 -0700
Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA01722
          ; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 06:10:26 -0700
Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1])
	by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id PAA11078
	; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 15:10:24 +0200
Received: from (roberto@localhost)
	by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) id PAA27909
	; Sun, 23 Jul 1995 15:10:23 +0200
From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert)
Message-Id: <199507231310.PAA27909@blaise.ibp.fr>
Subject: Re: Poul's new malloc
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 1995 15:10:22 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: phk@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <277.806467407@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jul 22, 95 07:43:27 pm
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT ctm#880
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 422       
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> Just to save any of you the trouble - this malloc is NOT plug
> compatible with the BSD malloc.  If you attempt to replace it you'll
> have segfaults galore - I just tried it.. :-)

Maybe the addresses returned are not page aligned ? The dlmalloc seems to have
the same problem...
-- 
Ollivier ROBERT     -=- The daemon is FREE! -=-     roberto@FreeBSD.ORG
      FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT #5: Fri Jul 14 12:28:04 MET DST 1995