From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Dec 6 09:44:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB26A7370 for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 09:44:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B3E41F16 for ; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 09:44:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so115227728wmw.0 for ; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 01:44:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6OJSj62X7tjedKhyU4/7svSmy3NcA56Oj4WVKQTmFPw=; b=EdV0vYGI/qH4YfWAnaqGcB2uTFGnDJt7hfAEzQCWBX8GcZI+KmpygeyVh2PJZUyru/ PsZuzi6k0M3LBV2ZnKqZNY7e7Kgi7qSnQlb3Pcv6lMxXNVJhqqjPZD8KYapbbLlRfjUx G+AeapOuXj0UtsQpdodDhrYYS3rgk9ZF9F/TtTBVdB3MkbIkE3nAifJoicmwPNqadHFf ZSAQO/LN342PJ/QYuvxN3Ve3Hverm3Xf6rbZxDSjio/pkWXDV7bMNGPCfmsjOjRfhLBI o9gke0XtRYx7PLNIZGcwC0it4yC3BUkwCOhgT9SQcoFh9QvznSKuSP/GHU8MWBcN80vu ULHg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.94.1 with SMTP id s1mr14229546wmb.60.1449395087757; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 01:44:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.149.136 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 01:44:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 12:44:47 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: squid default options From: Pavel Timofeev To: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 09:44:49 -0000 Hi! I'm a maintainer of squid port and I'd like to ask you about default squid options turned on by default. Squid 4 is in release candidate stage now and we already have an initial port for it here https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203860. So, how do you think, what options should be turned on by default? I think the main idea should be if option doesn't invoke any additional dependency it should be turned on. However, there are options like TP_{IPF,IPFW,PF} which mean 'Transparent proxying with {IPF,IPFW,PF}'. They don't invoke any dependency. If you have GENERIC kernel and world, of course. Well, I know, we can't satisfy everyone, so default option set have to be guided by common sense and appropriate for the most. But there are FreeBSD based OSs like pfSense, FreeNAS, etc.. Should we think/care about them? To be honest I've never used them. I can misunderstand something. Same story with GSSAPI_BASE. It needs kerberos from base system, that can absent in others FreeBSD bases OSs.