From owner-freebsd-current Tue Aug 4 07:36:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA08725 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 07:36:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from antipodes.cdrom.com (castles210.castles.com [208.214.165.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA08692 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 07:36:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@antipodes.cdrom.com) Received: from antipodes.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antipodes.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA00558; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 07:34:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199808041434.HAA00558@antipodes.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Bruce Evans cc: mike@smith.net.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG, rock@cs.uni-sb.de, tlambert@primenet.com Subject: Re: IO performance (UFS read clustering), bad ZIP drive performance In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 04 Aug 1998 22:58:00 +1000." <199808041258.WAA01326@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1998 07:34:37 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >Should it be committed? You could have included that information > >in-band in the original posting, and I would have done so instead of > >filing it in my "to be worried about" folder. > > It depends :-). Given that you hold the "depends" criteria, will you be assessing them and taking the ultimately requisite action, or should I just commit the patch and wait for your complaint(s) in the hope that they're more illuminating? -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message